🔗 Share this article

UN's top security body has approved a American-supported resolution that favors Morocco's position regarding the contested territory, despite significant opposition from neighboring Algeria.

Split Vote Strengthens Morocco's Position

While the recent decision was divided, the resolution represents the strongest support to date for Morocco's proposal to retain control over the territory, which additionally enjoys backing from most European Union members and a increasing number of African nation allies.

Resolution Framework and Key Components

The resolution describes Moroccan plan as a basis for negotiation. Similar to previous resolutions, the document doesn't include a vote on independence that contains sovereignty as an option, which constitutes the approach long favored by the independence-seeking Polisario Front and its allies.

Genuine autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty could represent a most practical solution.

Background Context

The territory is a phosphate-rich area of coastal desert the area of a US state which was under Spanish control until the mid-1970s. It is claimed by both the Moroccan government and the Polisario Front, which functions from temporary settlements in southwestern neighboring Algeria and claims to speak for the indigenous people native to the disputed territory.

Decision Results and Global Responses

The US, which proposed the measure, led eleven nations in voting in support, while 3 countries – multiple nations – abstained. Algeria, the movement's primary supporter, did not participate.

Mike Waltz, the US ambassador to the UN, said the vote had been "historic" and would "build on the progress for a long, long overdue peace in the region".

Amar Bendjama, the Algerian ambassador to the United Nations, commented that while the resolution was an improvement on earlier versions, it "still has a series of deficiencies".

Peacekeeping Mission and Upcoming Assessment

The measure also renews the United Nations security operation in the territory for an additional year, as has been done for over three decades. Prior renewals, though, have not contained a mention to Morocco and its supporters' preferred outcome.

The UN resolution calls on all parties involved to "take this unprecedented opportunity for a enduring peace." Based on developments, it asks the UN leader to review the peacekeeping mission's authority within half a year.

Regional Consequences and Current Conditions

The change could disrupt a protracted process that for many years has escaped settlement, desdespite a UN security operation that was designed to be temporary. Protests have ensued in indigenous refugee camps in Algeria this week, where people have pledged not to abandon their fight for self-determination.

The Moroccan government controls almost all of Western Sahara, excluding a narrow area known as the "free zone" that lies east of a constructed by Morocco sand wall.

Past Context and Current Events

A 1991 truce was intended to pave the way for a vote on self-determination, but disagreements over participation criteria prevented it from taking place.

Through time, the Moroccan government has transformed the contested territory, building a maritime facility and a long road. Government subsidies keep food and energy costs affordable, and the population has grown significantly as Moroccan citizens establish homes in urban areas such as major settlements.

The movement ended the truce in recent years after confrontations near a route the government was constructing to neighboring Mauritania.

The group has since frequently reported security activity, while Morocco has mostly denied active fighting. The UN describes it "limited hostilities".

International Relations and Coming Possibilities

Reacting to the proposed measure, Polisario said that it would not join any initiative aiming "to 'legitimise' Moroccan illegal presence," adding resolution "cannot happen by rewarding expansionism".

The conflict represents the driving force in north African international relations. Morocco considers endorsement of its proposal as a standard for how it assesses its international partners.

Last October, the UN envoy suggested partitioning the territory, a suggestion no party agreed to. He urged the government to specify what autonomy would involve and cautioned that a lack of development might raise questions about the UN's role and "if there remains opportunity and willingness for us to remain effective."

The initiative to reassess the UN operation comes as the US slashes funding for UN programmes and agencies, including peacekeeping.